File Compression & Encryption:
Website: WinRAR
-
G.Skill F3-14400CL8D-4GBGT1 (1940MHz OC C8)
-
G.Skill F3-12800Cl7D-4GBPI (1940MHz OC C9)
-
G.Skill F3-14400CL8D-4GBGT1 (1800MHz C8)
-
G.Skill F3-14400CL8D-4GBGT1 (1600MHz C7 LL)
-
G.Skill F3-12800Cl7D-4GBPI (1600MHz C7)
-
Corsair CM3X2G1600C9DHX (1925MHz C9 OC)
-
Corsair CM3X2G1600C9DHX (1600MHz C7 LL)
-
Corsair CM3X2G1600C9DHX (1600MHz C9)
Time in seconds (lower is better)
-
G.Skill F3-14400CL8D-4GBGT1 (1940Mhz C8 OC)
-
G.Skill F3-12800Cl7D-4GBPI (1940MHz C9 OC)
-
G.Skill F3-14400CL8D-4GBGT1 (1800MHz C8)
-
G.Skill F3-12800Cl7D-4GBPI (1600MHz C7)
-
G.Skill F3-14400CL8D-4GBGT1 (1600MHz C7 LL)
-
Corsair CM3X2G1600C9DHX (1600MHz C7 LL)
-
Corsair CM3X2G1600C9DHX (1925MHz C9 OC)
-
Corsair CM3X2G1600C9DHX (1600MHz C9)
Time in seconds (lower is better)
Again both the G.Skills hit the top of the tables here - the GT1s nose ahead by a few seconds on average between large and small file compression because of their high clock speeds. On the nForce 790i Ultra SLI board though the Corsair is, on average, some way down the table in all its results for both large and small file compression. Both the G.Skill kits are slightly faster by at least a few seconds.
-
G.Skill F3-12800Cl7D-4GBPI (1740MHz C9 OC)
-
G.Skill F3-14400CL8D-4GBGT1 (1600MHz C6 LL)
-
G.Skill F3-12800Cl7D-4GBPI (1600MHz C7)
-
G.Skill F3-12800Cl7D-4GBPI (1600MHz C6 LL)
-
Corsair CM3X2G1600C9DHX (1600MHz C7 LL)
-
Corsair CM3X2G1600C9DHX (1600MHz C9)
-
G.Skill F3-14400CL8D-4GBGT1 (1740MHz C9)
-
Corsair CM3X2G1600C9DHX (1760MHz C9 OC)
Time in seconds (lower is better)
-
G.Skill F3-12800Cl7D-4GBPI (1740MHz C9 OC)
-
G.Skill F3-12800Cl7D-4GBPI (1600MHz C7)
-
Corsair CM3X2G1600C9DHX (1760MHz C9 OC)
-
G.Skill F3-12800Cl7D-4GBPI (1600MHz LL)
-
G.Skill F3-14400CL8D-4GBGT1 (1600MHz LL)
-
Corsair CM3X2G1600C9DHX (1600MHz C7 LL)
-
G.Skill F3-14400CL8D-4GBGT1 (1740MHz C9)
-
Corsair CM3X2G1600C9DHX (1600MHz C9)
Time in seconds (lower is better)
On the Intel X48 board things are again very closely matched, but this time the overclocked GT1s are near the bottom, and even turn out a seconds slower on average than the Corsair at its stock speeds in large file compression. In contrast, the G.Skill Pis are at the top of the table, but the general gist of things is that lower latency is just as preferred over high clock speeds here but doesn't guarantee a fast result in WinRAR.
Want to comment? Please log in.